Oh, how I enjoyed this riveting EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Jeff Gannon on the LifeLike Pundits blog. Softball questions asked of the master of all softballs, and still 30% of the questions get no answers.
Read the comments section and enjoy watching conservatives defend a gay male hooker. It’s priceless. Near the very end, I just had to chime in:
ProfShade asks: Got proof he was a prostitute while in the WH?
Why, yes, it’s a website where he advertises his services for $200/night. You don’t have to prove the exchange of money or performance of sexual services to prove prostitution.
[From FindLaw: Prostitution laws make it a crime in most states to offer, agree to, or engage in a sexual act for compensation. Depending upon applicable state law, the stages of a typical prostitution “transaction” can involve charges against the provider of services (for “prostitution”), the customer paying for the services (for “solicitation of prostitution”), and any middleman (for “pandering” or “pimping”).]
Now, it might be a tough case since he never did explicitly offer sex for money. Just like those “My Actual Photo” ads in the back of the Weekly or those Oriental Massage parlors offering “full release” massage. So I apologize, I have no proof of “prostitution”, only an “escort” offering his nude shaved body with 8+ cut as a “top”. Typical liberal moonbat, I suppose, with all my assumptions.
ProfShade seems proud that he’s been a Republican for 30 years and has no problem with gays. Hmm, I’ll bet some of your best friends are gay, right? RightWingSparkle insists that being against gay marriage doesn’t mean you’re against gays, heck, she even has gay friends and family, and knows gays who are against gay marriage.
It’s nice to see the right wing support homosexuals, as long as they know their proper place — not at the wedding altar, not on cartoon shows, not in the military, but definitely offering sexual services on the internet and asking softball questions of the Administration.
(Who are these gays against gay marriage? Are they affiliated with Christians against Christ? Or perhaps the Black KKK?)
Just so I can fully understand, let me see if I’ve got this brave new Republican world straight:
* A person’s gay private life is irrelevant.
* Post 9/11 security procedures restricting who can be near the president are irrelevant.
* Private partisan websites that parrot administration rhetoric are legitimate news organizations.
* Plagiarizing prostitutes with pseudonyms are legitimate reporters.
* Liberals are intolerant hypocrites for noticing public gay nude urination photos on the internet.
* Conservatives are morally consistent when they oppose gay marriage, gays in the military, gayness in movies, cartoons, and TV shows, while supporting the right of someone to be gay in their public business life.
Republicans Love Gay Male Hookers – it’s a step in the right direction!
